Name: Analyzing Discrepancies in a Software Development Project Change Request (CR) Assessment Process and Recommendations for Process Improvements (en Inglés)
Price: 1324.87 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: National Aeronautics and Space Administr ; Cunningham, Kenneth James
ISBN: 9781288909841

Envío gratis

portada Analyzing Discrepancies in a Software Development Project Change Request (CR) Assessment Process and Recommendations for Process Improvements (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

National Aeronautics and Space Administr

Kenneth James Cunningham

Editorial

Biblioscholar

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.2 cm

Peso

0.10 kg.

ISBN13

9781288909841

Categorías

Educación

Analyzing Discrepancies in a Software Development Project Change Request (CR) Assessment Process and Recommendations for Process Improvements (en Inglés)

National Aeronautics and Space Administr (Autor) · Kenneth James Cunningham (Autor) · Biblioscholar · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 1,324.87

$ 2,208.11

Ahorras: $ 883.24

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 15 de Julio y el Martes 23 de Julio.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Analyzing Discrepancies in a Software Development Project Change Request (CR) Assessment Process and Recommendations for Process Improvements (en Inglés)"

The Change Request (CR) assessment process is essential in the display development cycle. The assessment process is performed to ensure that the changes stated in the description of the CR match the changes in the actual display requirements. If a discrepancy is found between the CR and the requirements, the CR must be returned to the originator for corrections. Data was gathered from each of the developers to determine the type of discrepancies and the amount of time spent assessing each CR. This study sought to determine the most common types of discrepancies, and the amount of time required to assessing those issues. The study found that even though removing discrepancy before an assessment would save half the time needed to assess an CR with a discrepancy, the number of CR's found to have a discrepancy was very small compared to the total number of CR's assessed during the data gathering period.