Compartir
Crs Report for Congress: Affirmative Action and Diversity in Public Education: Legal Developments: July 16, 2007 - Rl30410 (en Inglés)
Congressional Research Service the Libr
(Autor)
·
Jody Feder
(Autor)
·
Bibliogov
· Tapa Blanda
Crs Report for Congress: Affirmative Action and Diversity in Public Education: Legal Developments: July 16, 2007 - Rl30410 (en Inglés) - Feder, Jody ; Congressional Research Service the Libr
$ 413.49
$ 689.15
Ahorras: $ 275.66
Elige la lista en la que quieres agregar tu producto o crea una nueva lista
✓ Producto agregado correctamente a la lista de deseos.
Ir a Mis Listas
Origen: Estados Unidos
(Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)
Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el
Miércoles 17 de Julio y el
Jueves 25 de Julio.
Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.
Reseña del libro "Crs Report for Congress: Affirmative Action and Diversity in Public Education: Legal Developments: July 16, 2007 - Rl30410 (en Inglés)"
Nearly a quarter century after the Supreme Court ruling in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, the diversity rationale for affirmative action in public education remains a topic of political and legal controversy. Many colleges and universities have implemented affirmative action policies not only to remedy past discrimination, but also to achieve a racially and ethnically diverse student body or faculty. Justice Powell, in his opinion for the Bakke Court, stated that the attainment of a diverse student body is "a constitutionally permissible goal for an institution of higher education," noting that "[t]he atmosphere of speculation, experiment, and creation' so essential to the quality of higher education is widely believed to be promoted by a diverse student body." In recent years, however, federal courts began to question the Powell rationale, unsettling expectations about the constitutionality of diversity-based affirmative action in educational admissions and faculty hiring. After a series of conflicting lower court rulings were issued regarding the use of race to promote a diverse student body, the Supreme Court agreed to review the race-conscious admissions policies used by the undergraduate and law school admissions programs at the University of Michigan. In Grutter v. Bollinger, a 5 to 4 ...
