Name: Finance and Economics Discussion Series: Explaining Cyclical Movements in Employment: Creative Destruction or Changes in Utilization (en Inglés)
Price: 496.71 MXN
Availability: InStock
Author: Figura, Andrew ; United States Federal Reserve Board
ISBN: 9781288709465

Envío gratis

portada Finance and Economics Discussion Series: Explaining Cyclical Movements in Employment: Creative Destruction or Changes in Utilization (en Inglés)

Formato

Libro Físico

Autor

United States Federal Reserve Board

Andrew Figura

Editorial

Bibliogov

Idioma

Inglés

N° páginas

Encuadernación

Tapa Blanda

Dimensiones

24.6 x 18.9 x 0.2 cm

Peso

0.09 kg.

ISBN13

9781288709465

Categorías

Política y gobierno

Finance and Economics Discussion Series: Explaining Cyclical Movements in Employment: Creative Destruction or Changes in Utilization (en Inglés)

United States Federal Reserve Board (Autor) · Andrew Figura (Autor) · Bibliogov · Tapa Blanda

Libro Nuevo

$ 496.71

$ 827.85

Ahorras: $ 331.14

40% descuento

Envío normal

Origen: Estados Unidos (Costos de importación incluídos en el precio)

Se enviará desde nuestra bodega entre el Lunes 29 de Julio y el Martes 06 de Agosto.

Lo recibirás en cualquier lugar de México entre 1 y 3 días hábiles luego del envío.

Reseña del libro "Finance and Economics Discussion Series: Explaining Cyclical Movements in Employment: Creative Destruction or Changes in Utilization (en Inglés)"

An important step in understanding why employment fluctuates cyclically is determining the relative importance of cyclical movements in permanent and temporary plant-level employment changes. If movements in permanent employment changes are important, then recessions are times when the destruction of job specific capital picks up and/or investment in new job capital slows. If movements in temporary employment changes are important, then employment fluctuations are related to the temporary movement of workers across activities (e.g., from work to home production or search and back again) as the relative costs/benefits of these activities change. I estimate that in the manufacturing sector temporary employment changes account for approximately 60 percent of the change in employment growth over the cycle. However, if permanent employment changes create and destroy more capital than temporary employment changes, then their economic consequences would be relatively greater. The correlation between gross permanent employment changes and capital intensity across industries supports the hypothesis that permanent employment changes do create and destroy more capital than temporary employment changes.